← Back to Blog
Industry5 min readFebruary 20, 2026

The Case for Sharing Knowledge in Hood Cleaning

AH
Arthur Haggerty
IKECA CECS · PECT · Founder, HoodOps

Let me say the thing nobody in this industry wants to say out loud: we hoard knowledge like it is a competitive weapon, and it is holding all of us back.

Every KEC company I have talked to — and I have talked to hundreds — guards the same things: their pricing formulas, their scheduling approach, their client acquisition methods, their cleaning processes. I understand the instinct. You figured these things out through years of trial and error. You paid for that knowledge with lost clients, botched jobs, and nights spent redoing work that should have been done right the first time. Why would you hand that to a competitor?

Here is why: because the alternative is an industry that stays fragmented, unprofessional, and undervalued. And that hurts you more than sharing your knowledge ever could.

The Problem with Secrecy

When knowledge is hoarded, new operators enter the industry and learn by making mistakes. They underprice because they do not understand their costs. They skip access panels because nobody taught them why those panels matter. They clean on the wrong frequency because they have never read NFPA 96 Table 12.4. They use the wrong chemicals, damage the wrong surfaces, and leave the wrong impression with clients who then assume all hood cleaners are unreliable.

Every bad job performed by a poorly trained operator reflects on you. When a restaurant owner gets burned by a hack, they do not blame that specific company — they blame the industry. "Hood cleaners are all the same." "You never know what you are going to get." "I just go with whoever is cheapest because they all do the same thing."

That perception — that we are interchangeable and indistinguishable — is the direct result of an industry that does not share standards, does not share knowledge, and does not invest in raising the collective bar.

What Secrecy Actually Protects

Ask yourself honestly: what are you protecting by keeping your processes secret? Your pricing formula? Your competitors can get within 10 percent of your price by calling three of your clients. Your cleaning process? The basic techniques are the same across every competent operator — hot water, degreasers, pressure, and elbow grease. Your client relationships? Those are built on trust and performance, not on secret knowledge your competitor does not have.

The truth is, secrecy mostly protects mediocrity. When everyone keeps their methods private, there is no external benchmark to measure against. You do not know if your process is good — you only know it is yours. You do not know if your pricing is competitive — you only know you have been charging it for years. You do not know if your documentation meets the standard — you only know nobody has challenged it yet.

In an environment of shared knowledge, mediocrity is exposed. That is uncomfortable for companies that have been getting by on the minimum. But it is great for companies that actually do excellent work — because now there is a visible difference between good and bad, and customers can see it.

The Rising Tide Argument

When the overall quality of hood cleaning goes up, something predictable happens: customers trust the industry more. When customers trust the industry, they stop buying on price alone and start buying on value. They pay for documentation, for compliance assurance, for professional service. The entire market shifts upward.

This is not theory. It has happened in every trade that has professionalized. Electricians, plumbers, HVAC technicians — these trades went through the same evolution. Standards were established. Training was shared. Certification programs were created. The result was not that everyone became the same — it was that the floor rose. The worst operators either improved or left the industry, and the best operators thrived because customers could finally distinguish between quality and cut-rate work.

Hood cleaning is at that inflection point right now. IKECA has been pushing education and certification for years. NFPA 96 provides the regulatory framework. What is missing is the cultural shift — the willingness of established operators to share what they know instead of guarding it.

What Sharing Looks Like in Practice

I am not suggesting you publish your client list or hand your pricing spreadsheet to your competitor across town. Sharing knowledge is not about sacrificing your business — it is about elevating the trade.

Here is what it looks like in practice:

  • Share your approach to NFPA 96 compliance. How do you assess cooking type? How do you determine frequency? How do you document your work? These are not trade secrets — they are professional standards, and every operator should know them.
  • Talk about your mistakes. The job that went wrong, the client you lost, the process you changed. Your mistakes are someone else's lesson, and theirs are yours.
  • Mentor new operators. When someone new enters the industry in your market, you have two options: ignore them and hope they fail, or help them do good work. If they fail, a kitchen goes uncleaned and the industry's reputation takes another hit. If they succeed because you helped them, the market grows and your reputation as a leader grows with it.
  • Participate in industry organizations. IKECA, regional associations, online communities — these exist to share knowledge. Show up. Contribute. Ask questions. Answer them.
  • Advocate for better standards. Push for documentation requirements in your jurisdiction. Support certification programs. Encourage AHJs to enforce NFPA 96 consistently. When standards are enforced, companies that do good work win.

The Competitive Advantage of Generosity

Here is the counterintuitive truth: the companies that share knowledge freely end up with more competitive advantage, not less. They become known as leaders. They attract better employees — good technicians want to work for companies that invest in the trade, not companies that guard their processes behind locked doors. They build stronger relationships with fire marshals, who recognize them as professionals. They earn referrals from other operators who trust their judgment.

The old model says: protect everything, trust nobody, compete on secrecy. The new model says: share openly, collaborate on standards, compete on execution. In the old model, your advantage is what you know that others do not. In the new model, your advantage is what you can do better than anyone else — and that is a much more durable position.

I believe in this deeply enough that I built HoodOps around it. Not just software for individual companies, but a platform philosophy that says: when the industry gets better, everyone benefits. Your data is yours. Your clients are yours. But the knowledge of how to do this work well should belong to everyone.

We are all in the same industry. We all face the same challenges — finding technicians, managing compliance, pricing fairly, growing sustainably. We can face those challenges alone, guarding our hard-won knowledge from each other. Or we can face them together, raising the bar for everyone and building an industry that customers trust, fire marshals respect, and we can all be proud of.

I know which one I am choosing.

Share this article

Ready to see what purpose-built software looks like?

HoodOps launches Q3 2026. Claim your spot for early access and Founding Member pricing.

Claim Your Spot →